‘Living in Hell’: British boy sent to Ghana wins legal battle to return
3 min read
British teenager wins right to return from Ghana after court says his emotional well-being was overlooked.
British Teen Sent to Ghana by Parents Wins Legal Right to Return Home
A 14-year-old British boy has secured a legal victory to return to the UK after being forcibly relocated to Ghana by his parents under false pretenses. The decision, handed down by the UK Court of Appeal, reverses an earlier High Court ruling and emphasizes the importance of a child’s right to be heard.
Taken to Ghana Under False Pretenses
Raised in London, the teenager believed he was traveling to Ghana to visit a sick relative. Upon arrival, however, he discovered he had been enrolled in a boarding school with no plans for him to return home. The shocking revelation left the boy feeling betrayed and trapped, sparking a legal battle that would span over a year.
Parents Justify Their Actions with Safety Concerns
The parents defended their decision by citing fears for their son’s safety. They claimed he had been displaying worrying behavior, including possessing images of knives on his phone and holding large sums of unexplained cash—behaviors they interpreted as early signs of gang affiliation. Convinced that a change of environment was essential, they chose to send him to Ghana without his consent.
High Court Initially Backs Parents
In February 2024, the UK’s High Court ruled in favor of the parents. Justice Hayden acknowledged that while the boy had been misled, the relocation was a lawful exercise of parental responsibility. The court accepted the parents’ claim that the move was in the child’s best interests and stated that returning him to the UK could expose him to greater dangers.
Appeals Court Overturns High Court Ruling
However, on June 12, 2025, the UK Court of Appeal overturned the High Court’s ruling. Lord Justice McFarlane, delivering the lead judgment, argued that the previous decision failed to sufficiently consider the teenager’s emotional state and right to participate in decisions about his life. The Court reinstated wardship, granting the boy temporary protection under UK law and ordered the case to be reassigned to a different High Court judge for a fresh hearing.
Teen Describes Ghana Stay as ‘Living in Hell’
In his testimony, the teenager vividly described his time in Ghana as “living in hell.” Isolated from familiar surroundings and struggling to adjust, he expressed a strong desire to return to the UK and continue his education, even if that meant entering the foster care system. His clear articulation and maturity made a strong impression on the court.
Child’s Voice Recognized as Central in Ruling
This ruling marks a significant recognition of children’s autonomy in legal matters. The Court emphasized that children of secondary school age must be given a platform to express their views, especially when their future and emotional well-being are at stake. The judgment suggests that legal decisions affecting minors must balance parental concerns with a child’s right to self-determination.
Broader Implications for Diaspora Parenting Practices
The case has reignited public discourse around the controversial practice among diaspora families of sending children abroad for discipline, safety, or cultural grounding. While such decisions may be rooted in concern, experts warn that forcibly relocating children—especially without their input—can result in long-term psychological harm and potential breaches of their human rights.
Experts Warn Against Forced Relocations
Child welfare experts stress the importance of involving children in decisions about their lives. They argue that even well-intentioned relocations can lead to deep emotional trauma when carried out without consent. The ruling serves as a reminder to policymakers, educators, and families about the ethical and legal complexities involved in such decisions.
About The Author
