South Africa starts a soul-searching ‘national dialogue’ about poverty, inequality and other issues
3 min read
South Africa Launches Nationwide Dialogue to Tackle Poverty, Inequality, and Governance Challenges
A unifying call for solutions sparks hope and controversy as leaders and citizens gather to confront the country’s toughest problems.
A New Chapter in National Reflection
South Africa has embarked on a bold “national dialogue” aimed at confronting its most persistent social and economic problems. The two-day opening convention, taking place in the capital city of Pretoria, marks the start of a broader, ongoing conversation that President Cyril Ramaphosa describes as “a people-led process to reimagine our future.” The initiative seeks to unite political parties, civic organisations, and everyday citizens in open discussion, both in person and online.
Historical Context and the Urgency for Change
Since the landmark democratic election of 1994, which saw Nelson Mandela elected as the nation’s first Black president, South Africa has made strides in bridging racial divides, improving living standards, and expanding economic opportunities. However, more than three decades after the end of apartheid, deep cracks remain. Poverty and inequality levels are among the highest globally, unemployment exceeds 30%, and corruption, crime, and political instability remain chronic issues. Critics say the past decade has seen significant regression, with public frustration boiling over after the African National Congress (ANC) lost its parliamentary majority in 2024.
Ramaphosa’s Vision for the Dialogue
President Ramaphosa, responding to strong calls from civil society, announced the dialogue in June 2025. His stated goal is for it to be a platform where “every voice can be heard.” He emphasised that the process would not be controlled by government alone, but shaped by a broad spectrum of South Africans. “This dialogue is not just about diagnosing our problems but about envisioning a country we all want to live in,” he said.
Who’s at the Table?
The president has appointed an Eminent Persons Group, drawing figures from diverse sectors — from sports icons like national rugby captain Siya Kolisi to celebrated cultural figures such as “Black Panther” actor John Kani, and legal minds like former Constitutional Court Judge Edwin Cameron. These individuals are tasked with steering discussions and ensuring they reflect South Africa’s diversity.
Not All Voices Will Be Present
Despite the inclusive intent, some major players have opted out. The Democratic Alliance (DA), the second-largest party and part of the coalition government, withdrew over a dispute involving the dismissal of one of its deputy ministers. The DA has branded the talks a waste of public resources. The MK Party, the official opposition, has also refused to participate. Their absence casts doubt on how representative the discussions will truly be.
The Dialogue Structure
The initial convention is just the starting point. Plans include public engagements in all nine provinces, with the possibility of a second national gathering early next year. Discussions will cover multiple sectors, from economic reform to community safety, with contributions accepted both in physical forums and virtual meetings.
Financial Concerns and Public Perception
One of the most contentious issues surrounding the initiative is its cost, estimated by some critics at $40 million. The presidency disputes this figure, suggesting it is significantly lower, but acknowledges that a meaningful, nationwide process will require substantial investment. Political analyst Dirk Kotze of the University of Pretoria argues that, given the scale of the task, high costs are inevitable: “If you want to have a real nationwide process, then it is going to cost a lot of money. That’s unavoidable.”
Accusations of Political Manipulation
Opponents, including the DA, accuse the ANC of using the dialogue as a political tool ahead of next year’s local elections. They warn against the ruling party dominating the agenda and undermining the process’s credibility. Kotze adds that the ANC should step back and avoid appearing to control the discussions if the dialogue is to be seen as genuine and inclusive.
Looking Ahead
While the first steps have been met with both optimism and scepticism, the national dialogue represents one of the most ambitious public engagement exercises since the talks that ended apartheid. Whether it can deliver tangible results will depend on sustained participation, transparent management, and the willingness of all sides to listen as much as they speak.
About The Author
