Zelenskyy signs Ukraine anti-corruption law after protests prompt changes – as it happened

Ukraine Reinstates Anti-Corruption Agencies Amid Public Outcry

OMEGA TV UK- Following intense street protests and mounting public dissatisfaction, Ukraine government has moved to restore the powers of its anti-corruption bodies. The protests were triggered by the government’s earlier move to weaken the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP), a step widely condemned both locally and internationally. Civil society groups and watchdog organizations accused the administration of backsliding on reforms, especially at a time when public trust in governance is fragile due to ongoing war with Russia.

Controversial Move to Strip Agency Powers

Earlier this month, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s administration announced a decision to strip the NACP of its powers to inspect government officials and state agencies. The abrupt move raised serious concerns among reform advocates who feared it would undo years of anti-corruption progress. Critics argued that sidelining the NACP would embolden corrupt practices, particularly when billions in foreign aid are being funneled into the country for war efforts and reconstruction.

International Community Reacts Strongly

The decision to weaken the NACP drew swift and sharp criticism from Ukraine’s international allies. Key partners, including the European Union and the United States, emphasized that Ukraine’s continued access to financial and military support would be linked to its commitment to good governance. The International Monetary Fund also raised concerns about transparency and accountability. These warnings added pressure on the government to reverse course.

Parliament Votes to Restore Oversight Powers

Responding to the public backlash and international warnings, the Ukrainian parliament voted overwhelmingly to restore the NACP’s full mandate. The new legislation reinstates the agency’s authority to audit state institutions and investigate corruption-related issues. Lawmakers who initially supported the changes reversed their stance, citing the need to preserve public confidence and meet international expectations.

Public Confidence in Reforms Restored

The reinstatement of the NACP has helped to partially restore public confidence. Protesters hailed the move as a victory for democracy and accountability. Activists credited Ukraine’s vibrant civil society and free press for mobilizing public opinion and forcing political change. Observers note that Ukraine’s experience demonstrates how grassroots activism can hold leaders accountable, even in wartime.

Broader Efforts to Tackle Corruption

Ukraine has made steady efforts in recent years to strengthen its anti-corruption framework, including the establishment of the NACP, the High Anti-Corruption Court, and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau. While progress has been uneven, these institutions have helped to expose and prosecute several high-profile corruption cases. Reinstating the NACP is seen as a reaffirmation of Ukraine’s long-term commitment to reforms.

War Intensifies Need for Transparency

With billions in Western aid being directed to Ukraine, transparency and financial oversight remain essential. Donor nations have emphasized that continued assistance will depend on Ukraine’s ability to demonstrate credible progress in governance and institutional integrity. Restoring the NACP is viewed not just as a domestic issue, but as a necessary step to maintain international trust and cooperation.

Moving Forward

While the reinstatement of the NACP is a positive development, experts warn that sustained vigilance is needed to ensure reforms are implemented effectively. The government must work closely with civil society and international partners to build a transparent and accountable post-war recovery. Restoring trust in public institutions will be crucial to Ukraine’s stability and future development.

About The Author

Ama Oprah

See author's posts