Eleven individuals recently deported from the United States have filed a lawsuit against the government of Ghana, arguing that their detention in a military facility violates the nation’s laws. Their lawyer, Oliver-Barker Vormawor, revealed that none of the deportees committed any crime in Ghana, yet they remain confined without due process.

Legal Demands for Accountability

According to Mr. Vormawor, the legal team is demanding that the government produce the deportees before a court of law. The central question, he said, is whether the state has the legal authority to detain them after their arrival. The case challenges the government to justify what critics describe as an arbitrary use of state power that undermines the rights of individuals who have already faced expulsion from another country.

Government Silence and Political Reactions

The Ghanaian government has so far declined to comment directly on the lawsuit. However, authorities had previously confirmed that another 40 deportees were expected to arrive in the coming weeks. This has triggered strong reactions in parliament, where opposition members are calling for an immediate suspension of the deportation agreement with the United States. They argue that parliamentary approval is legally required before Ghana can formally accept deportees under such a deal.

Conflicting Government Statements

The controversy has been compounded by conflicting remarks from senior officials. President John Mahama initially stated that 14 West African deportees who arrived in Ghana were quickly repatriated to their countries of origin. Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, however, contradicted this claim, saying that only “most” of the deportees were returned. Mr. Vormawor’s court filing disputes both accounts, insisting that 11 deportees remain in Ghanaian custody.

Deportees Describe Harsh Removal from the US

Court documents reveal that before arriving in Ghana, the group was held in a US detention center. They were then shackled and transported aboard a military cargo aircraft, conditions that the lawyer described as degrading and inhumane. The deportees maintain that their current detention in Ghana amounts to a second punishment—one they believe is unlawful.

US Deportation Policies Under Scrutiny

The case comes against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s tough immigration stance. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has pledged to carry out record-breaking deportations of individuals residing illegally in the United States. This approach has sparked controversy both domestically and internationally, with critics accusing the administration of prioritizing political optics over humanitarian concerns.

Ghana’s Humanitarian Position

Responding to criticism, Ghana’s Foreign Minister Ablakwa defended the decision to accept the deportees. Speaking to Reuters, he emphasized that the move was based on humanitarian principles and pan-African solidarity. He insisted that Ghana’s cooperation with the US on deportations should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. Instead, he described it as an effort to provide safe passage for West Africans affected by US policies.

Additional Legal Challenges in the US

The legal battle is not limited to Ghana. Five of the deportees—including three Nigerians and two Gambians—have also filed lawsuits in the United States. They argue that their deportation violated existing court orders protecting them from removal. By challenging the US government directly, these individuals highlight the complex intersection of international law, immigration enforcement, and human rights.

Omega Tv UK celebrates ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARY, we wish to thank all our viewers for helping us reach this milestone.

Happy 1st anniversary to Omega TV UK!.

Wider Implications for Ghana

The lawsuit in Accra raises broader questions about Ghana’s sovereignty, its legal obligations under international agreements, and its responsibility to safeguard human rights. Civil society groups and opposition lawmakers warn that detaining people without clear legal grounds risks tarnishing Ghana’s democratic image. With more deportees expected, the case could set a significant precedent in determining how the nation handles future arrivals.

A Test of Law and Policy

As the case unfolds, Ghana faces the difficult task of balancing humanitarian empathy with the rule of law and national interests. For the deportees, the immediate concern is their freedom and dignity. For Ghana, the outcome will serve as a litmus test of its legal framework and its capacity to stand firm in the face of international political pressures.

About The Author