Civil society groups in Uganda have strongly criticised a proposed “Protection of Sovereignty Bill”, warning it could suppress dissent and damage the economy as debate intensifies ahead of its introduction in parliament.
At a press briefing, former cabinet minister Miria Matembe condemned the rapid pace at which the legislation is being pushed forward, calling it both controversial and widely rejected by the public.
“I have never seen such a controversial, widely rejected bill being rushed to be debated within two days,” she said, questioning the urgency behind its parliamentary process.
The draft law would criminalise any action considered to promote “the interests of a foreigner against the interests of Uganda.” It also proposes classifying individuals or organisations receiving foreign funding as “foreign agents.”
Critics argue that the wording is overly broad and could be used to target journalists, activists, and opposition voices, drawing comparisons to similar laws in other countries that have been accused of restricting civic freedoms.
However, not all reactions have been negative. Some Ugandans say stronger oversight of foreign funding is necessary.
Businessman and event organiser Elijah Rabwoni supported the proposal, arguing that better regulation could improve transparency.
“The law is controversial, but it is good,” he said. “Many people are receiving money without proper monitoring. If the government supervises it, that is positive.”
Despite such support, others fear the bill could have wider economic consequences.
Motorcycle taxi driver Samuel Musoba warned that reduced foreign funding could affect livelihoods and small businesses.
“If the money is not coming into the country, business will not move,” he said. “It will affect me and my family at the end of the day.”
The proposal has triggered growing concern among rights organisations, media groups and sections of the private sector, who say it could undermine democratic freedoms and discourage international investment in Uganda.
Legal experts and activists also caution that vague definitions in the bill could give authorities broad powers to determine what constitutes “foreign influence,” potentially criminalising legitimate advocacy work or international partnerships.
Uganda has faced repeated scrutiny in recent years over shrinking civic space and restrictions on opposition activity, and critics say the new bill could deepen those concerns.
As parliament prepares to debate the legislation, tensions continue to rise between supporters who see it as a sovereignty safeguard and opponents who view it as a threat to free expression and economic stability.
The outcome of the debate is expected to have significant implications for Uganda’s political climate and its relationship with international donors and partners.
